(close)

At CHCMC
an Australian experimental
aesthetic emerged ...

Terminal Moraine (1980)

Whether it was a coincidence or shared circumstances, the Clifton Hill Community Music Centre (CHCMC) emerged just as punk’s ‘just do it’ attitude melded with emerging postmodern sensibilities, which, among other things, led art-makers to coalesce in new spaces that ignored even the mainstream’s alternative venues. Although CHCMC began as a community-oriented music venue, it soon gave way to new creative, political, and philosophical pathways that artists developed and explored during its five or so years of activity. I hope that this site will be used by both researchers and casual listeners to unpack specific works, potentially revealing their significance to experimental art practice in Australia.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, a notable shift occurred as institutionalised culture began to lose its dominant grip while universities underwent corporatisation and became less relevant. Concurrently, popular culture, once looked down upon within the arts, gained new legitimacy and was recognized as a rich and entangled field to explore. For some of us, unskilled in traditional art-making and disillusioned with mainstream music practices, a creative gap opened that we could fill by exploring music-making, sound, and performance; uncovering novel concepts; and experimenting with new methods that embraced our varying levels of competence.

Melbourne is a big music town, and back in the late ’70s and early ’80s, CHCMC emerged as a space on the margins of the mainstream where experiments and shifts in cultural discourse played out, both performatively and audibly, to a small but growing audience. The Centre provided a supportive space for emerging artists and their temporal art-making that didn’t fit commercial and academic expectations.

Artworks performed at CHCMC were wide ranging in scope, primarily involving music, but also performance, film, video and installation. These works de-emphasised traditional ideals of craft, expression and musicianship; moreover the artworks were often critical of the dominant channels of music and art production and their cultural framings that were pervasive in mainstream culture.

At CHCMC, a fresh Australian experimental aesthetic emerged—one that ceased to replicate American and European ideas and trends. Instead, expressive forms reflected local experiences and themes, and had room for different approaches that included, for some artists, modernist counter-culture methods, and for others the creation of works that deconstructed what some saw as pervasive modernist tropes.

Explorations of broader topics were primarily explored, articulated, and expressed through music, sound, and moving images, rather than through written texts or curatorial frameworks. This included political and Indigenous themes—albeit from colonial-settler perspectives—as seen in the works of Ron Nagorcka and IDA. Curiously, listening back to the archive today, it is noticeable how the Australian accent became very prominent. Exemplified by figures like Chris Mann, Ernie Althoff, Ralph Traviato, Adrian Martin, and others, it is a though it signaled a fresh, personal voice of liberation and expression. Spoken word still had a role to play: Warren Burt, Ernie Althoff, and Chris Mann often spoke at length about their works, prior to, or as part of their performances, and Tsk Tsk Tsk often presented short writings to accompany their performances. But the music always came first. Inbetween performances, appraisals and critiques would take place around the large silver tea urn.

As I now see it, CHCMC was a site where postmodernism 1 emerged in Australian art practice, although none of us were familiar with the term at that time. Initially evident among younger performers, including my own generation, this emergence involved both intuitive and deliberate deconstructions of modernist artistic and cultural methods and aesthetics, occasionally challenging the approaches of older CHCMC artists who’s creative pathways were informed by a counter-culture practice that still drew on modernist methods. Revisiting all the works within this archive today, I find them all equally intriguing, making it challenging now for the visitor to distinguish between these two creative ontologies. Listening back, I recognise influences in my own music from older composers like Warren Burt. But it is still worth acknowledging that as these different creative approaches rubbed up against each other at CHCMC it created a creative friction that was ultimately productive for all.

My memories of this time also include non-sonic aspects of CHCMC’s creative milieu, which were still important: what we spoke about, how different people dressed (according to their sub-cultural milieu), and all the range of styles, methods and interests we all brought to CHCMC.

And so, for the keen listener, these recordings capture a dialectic of aesthetics, derived through modern and postmodern creative methods and through framings that were variously expressed through the music, performance, film and video. For example, the slightly older composers tended to experiment with inner musical structures and processes, while us younger composers concerned themselves with external structures, such musical context and the spectacle of performance.

It was a busy time. New works were being created each week, often in response to what other artists had presented the week before. Themes and ideas were explored directly through the act of making and presenting music, films and performance, with discourses that reflected certain philosophical precedents at the time – Marxism, the French New Wave, semiotics, structuralism. Some artists referenced contemporary American thinkers or experimented with novel musical and sonic concepts and structures, uncovering new aesthetic outcomes. For example, there was the use of multiple cassette recorders by some artists to layer up sounds in a process that gradually transformed simple recorded utterances into dense, distorted and evocative soundscape (Graeme Davis, Plastic Platypus, Ernie Althoff), or the deployment of novel tunings and pitch sets (Warren Burt). Some performers applied film theory that, at the time, was being being taught at La Trobe University and at Melbourne State College (Phillip Brophy, Adrian Martin, Robert Goodge Goodge, David Chesworth, Rolando Caputo). Other performer were influenced directly by the artists who performing before them at CHCMC.

All this was taking place within a world that was still very analogue; where tapes took time to rewind and musical works and performances often emerged slowly over long timescales, and where cheap super-8 film’s grainy images evoked a visual aesthetic that now appears quaint and old in comparison with digital images. Sound Art hadn’t yet emerged as a distinct discipline or even as a term. There was no internet, no mobile phones, nor social media to disseminate what was taking place at CHCMC. Instead, the mainstream and alternative press had full control, while public radio stations were just starting to get a foothold. Some journalists harboured suspicions about CHCMC’s ‘off the grid’ activities: its motives and critical attitudes, often calling us arrogant for our dismissal of mainstream culture.

Amongst all this, I remember that we were being told that we would all soon be swamped by an incoming tidal wave of digital technology. It was difficult then to picture how this would affect us and how it would forever transform the fidelity of the mediascape, our methods, and our creative pathways, which it has certainly done.

This rare archive of a nascent experimental music scene was recorded binaurally on cassette by Ernie Althoff – himself a regular performer at CHCMC. It is not a complete record, rather, it reflects Ernie’s personal choices, after all, no one asked him to make these recordings; he simply took it upon himself to attend performances and make them. Ernie’s own creative work is therefore well represented in these tapes.

The cassettes Ernie recorded had been resting on a shelf, silently for over 40 years until 2020/21 when they were transferred and organised into a digital archive for this site The cassette transfers were made by John Campbell, who was also a performer at CHCMC (and who initially uncovered the availability of the Organ Factory and its potential as a community space). I have done some restoration work on the recordings including compiling recordings of single events that Ernie spread across several cassettes in order to fill up any available space.

Some artists who were prolific at this time are not well represented in the archive, as they mainly performed electronic music that was considered to be already documented on tape. Warren Burt, a hugely significant artist during this time has relatively few recordings made at Clifton Hill. His prolific output was at the time mainly video and film-based. We have included a separate archive of some of Warren’s work with Plaistic Platypus from the 70s that also includes undated CHCMC performances that he recorded. This can be found under the ‘Other Recordings’ link.

In the Ephemera section you will find distinctive performance season posters designed by Philip Brophy and Ernie Althoff and copies of the New Music magazine (1978–81) edited and published by Philip Brophy and myself that contain reviews of performances followed by discussions with the artists who respond to the reviews. Also included are three earlier publications of The New Music Newspaper (1976–77) edited and published by Warren Burt and Les Gilbert (clicking on the cover images of the publication will reveal their content). You will also find photos and ephemera associated with CHCMC. There weren’t many photographs taken at CHCMC, as it was considered indulgent by some of us to think that one’s contribution should be preserved beyond the performance, plus taking photos back then was expensive and we were not rich. In retrospect we are thankful that some photos were taken and recording were made. We are fortunate that photographer and CHCMC performer Jane Joyce took a range of shots that appear throughout the site, as did members of →↑→ and myself. Other photographs are being be added as they come to light.

CHCMC Performers are encouraged to send in information and clarifications and to flesh out their own biogs. If any of you have recordings of CHCMC performances that we have missed then please us know.

David Chesworth


  1. Postmodernism as I define it here, was an intellectual stance or mode of discourse defined by a skepticism toward the grand narratives and ideologies of modernism, as well as opposition to epistemic certainty and the stability of meaning. 

(close)
(close)
(close)
(close)
00:00/
–83)

Clifton Hill
Community Music Centre

This is an archive of music performances with associated recordings, posters and publications that took place regularly at the Clifton Hill Community Music Centre (CHCMC) between 1976 and 1983. Based in an old organ factory in Melbourne, it became a space for experimentation in music, sound and other temporal art forms. Play the binaural recordings below while you investigate the site. (This archive is incomplete)

Audio only
Filter by:
synthesizerprocess musicvoiceImprovisationFilm (super 8 or 16 mm)Video'performance'tape playbackcassettes as performance toolsminimalism/repetitionbands/groups
IndexArtist/sTitleDurationDate
001The Clifton Hill Community Music Centre opening Concert18.06.76
Anecdote

The opening performance at Clifton Hill featuring ‘a special short program of low budget technology/music by Warren Burt & Ron Nagorcka’

002Redbird15.09.76
003Music for flutes, guitars and cassette recorders20.09.76
004Rubbish band and junk electronic workshop 126.09.76
005Environmental sound installation28.09.76
006Bob & Mal show: songs, jokes and performance art02.10.76
007Rubbish band and junk electronic workshop 210.10.76
008New compositions & improvisations01.05.77
009PLAYPAUSESalon music with Atom Bomb61:1403.05.77
Anecdote

Atom Bomb, a work by Ron Nagorcka employs voice, toy instruments, and cassette recorders. The work uses iterative process of live recording and playing back between two or more cassette players, slowly incorporating previously recorded performance elements, while also gradually layering up the distortions inherent in the equipment and the accumulating ambience of the room.

Also see here.

Greame Davis and Ernie Althoff were other CHCMC artists who often used this process.

010Melbourne autumn festival of organ and harpsichord04.05.77
Anecdote

Through to May 15. Ron Nagorcka had some connection to festival. More information to come.

011Spinning Speakers29.05.77
Anecdote

Some or all of Bill’s performances took place in the large downstairs space, which may have been what took place in this case, although I don’t remember. It could have happened outside, in front the building. The space needed to be big enough to swing small speakers attached to cables.

012Music by Ron Nagorcka & Warren Burt07.06.77
013PLAYPAUSENew pieces for reeds & piano77:4513.06.77
Anecdote

This recording came from Les’s personal collection and we’re pretty certain it was from this evening’s concert and probably recorded by Les. The cassette has a note which states: ‘Divertivements for a pianist. CHCMC. ’77.’

014Music by themselves, LaMonte Young, John Cage, John White20.06.77
015PLAYPAUSECoathanger Event17:0212.11.77
Anecdote

An installation exhibited over the weekend of November 12-13 1977.
The work appears to have been split into several areas and offered the visitor different engagements that are discussed in a review by Robin Teese in New Music Newspaper Issue 3 p.7 (see a copy in Ephemera)
One of the works Winds and Circuits used audio derived from handheld metal coat hangers to derive television signals to create electronic visual patterns.
Ros tells us that this recording was derived from an arrangement of metal coat hangers to which thin cables are attached and held in the ears of each user.

016PLAYPAUSEMinimalism84:4105.04.78
Anecdote
  • Poster says: “Tsk Tsk Tsk instruct the unhip squares with an enlightening historical retrospective of their works and sex lives”
  • “one of the most severely minimal performances I’ve ever heard. Merciless. Quite a fine thing, that I can only approve” Warren Burt, New Music Newspaper issue 1 page 14.
017Nice Noise. Our all new format of modern teen music will nuetralize you02.08.78
018Kaboom -our pop play explodes with all the bangs of wartime Hollywood09.08.78
019PLAYPAUSESolo; real time73:5316.08.78
Anecdote

David Tolley was a well-known and highly regarded jazz musician who played acoustic bass and had recently discovered a love for synthesizer - especially its sequencer!
On the cassette recording this work is titled ‘A Certain Survivalism’.

020Salad Music21.08.78
Anecdote

‘and others’

021Presents her electronic music23.08.78
022Solo 2; real time30.08.78
023Plays it againagainagain04.09.78
024Constructed cinema11.09.78
Anecdote

‘Constructed cinema - we drop our music and shine with movie-buff disease’

025Games of chance and other music04.10.78
Anecdote

‘Malcom Tattersall and friends’

026Presents his music, live!11.10.78
Anecdote

A performance on a Saturday afternoon that didn’t appear on the regular poster. Ernie Althoff remembers that it occurred in relation to an Organ Factory clean-up working bee.

028IN18.10.78
Anecdote

Dura Dara and David Tolley

029Three Tape Pieces25.10.78
Anecdote

‘Three tape pieces featuring flute and voice, Chinese gong, computer music.’

030OUT01.11.78
031Pure M.O.R. music. The ultimate synthesis of a. garde and 3AK06.11.78
032Airs itself. 3rd-year composition students go public08.11.78
033Uses up yet more Eveready batteries15.11.78
034Present an evening of wonderful entertainment29.11.78
Anecdote

The Fab Four - John Crawford, Jane Joyce, David Chesworth, Philip Brophy

035More new (& sterile) films from the kids who brought you ‘Contracted Cinema’04.12.78
036PLAYPAUSEA mixed nite13:0806.12.78
Anecdote

Ernie’s contribution to the mixed night

037PLAYPAUSEMexican Divorce51:0128.03.79
038PLAYPAUSEMr Inadequate discovers static in his underpants22:0704.04.79
039PLAYPAUSEFive Duets for Prepared and Treated Guitars22:4304.04.79
Anecdote

Robert and David not yet performing as Essendon Airport.

040The Dave and Phil Duo11.04.79
041Familiar Females Return18.04.79
042no title25.04.79
Anecdote

Two separate performances. It would be great to hear what they presented, but alas…

043With no idea02.05.79
044PLAYPAUSEMr Inadequate and Binary Digit62:5230.05.79
045PLAYPAUSEErnie Althoff & Mr Inadequate20:2730.05.79
Anecdote

Graeme Davis performed the first half (as Mr Inadequate). This recording is of two pieces in the second half by Ernie Althoff who tells us: “The first piece, ‘A whirlwind tour of the great organs of Europe’ is two fingers pressed down on the FF keys of two cassette players loaded with identical cassettes made from the LP record ‘The great organs of Europe’. The second piece at 4:40, ‘March of the Metronomes’ is made with a slanted metronome and two vari-speed cassette players recording and replaying in ways fairly typical of that exploratory time.”

046PLAYPAUSEPlastic Platypus; triumphant return31:3506.06.79
Anecdote

This concert appears to be Ron playing solo rather than the duo with Warren Burt. Warren may have been overseas at the time.

047PLAYPAUSESelf distortion/self destruction46:4413.06.79
048PLAYPAUSESo, You Want To Be a Drummer? & 4 Organ Pieces38:0820.06.79
Anecdote

The night began with a mimed performance by David Chesworth, Rainer Linz and Robert Goodge of Chesworth’s record, Fifty Synthesizer Greats. Listen HERE on Bandcamp. This performance was mimed in the style of TV pop appearances in the day…Countdown etc). This was followed by ‘So You Want To Be a Drummer?’ for live drum machine and tape delay, which begins this recording, followed by a performance of Chesworth’s Four Organ Pieces (found at 17:00 on the recording)

049Nice noise. New & streamlined27.06.79
050PLAYPAUSEAnn Shirley, Robin Teese, Malcolm Tattersall30:5004.07.79
051Presents ‘The Microtones’11.07.79
052PLAYPAUSEA Sonic Investigation of the Trivial70:1018.07.79
Anecdote

This was the first performance of the group Essendon Airport although the group was yet to have a name for this performance.

053John Crawford performance08.08.79
054What I’m doing with your tax dollars this year15.08.79
055PLAYPAUSEMore tedious structuralism70:1122.08.79
056Even more tedious structuralism05.09.79
057PLAYPAUSEWhy I spent my holidays in Germany47:2012.09.79
Anecdote
  1. metapiece - sine tone and slide whistle
  2. three piano dances - electric piano
  3. percussion piece - tabletop percussion quartet
  4. five gas songs - CO2, N, H, He, O
  5. untitled piece for sine and pulse generators.
058PLAYPAUSEAn evening of pleasing sensual music31:4819.09.79
Anecdote

recorded at CHCMC by Ad Hoc. Designer’s title.

059Why my job at a slick/shit Carlton café has affected my perspective on electronic music26.09.79
Anecdote

The viewer should bear-in-mind that some of the titles of performances that appear on the posters (and in this archive) were not those of the artist’s choosing. Performers that had agreed to do a performance on a particular night often didn’t have a title ready, which left the door open for some creative titling from a certain poster designer.

060PLAYPAUSEShort Bright Ditties and Long Arduous Masterpieces62:4603.10.79
Anecdote

Duo comprising David Chesworth and Philip Brophy playing electric pianos. The first song is an arrangement of a Brian Eno song and the rest are originals by the duo.

061PLAYPAUSESonata for industrial deafness16:5810.10.79
062A Night At The Theatre (A Night of Carlton-esque ideals)24.10.79
Anecdote

I don’t remember who was in the group at the time. Parenthesis text in heading was added by the poster designer.

063PLAYPAUSEAccentuate the positive…36:5124.10.79
Anecdote

Other voices provided by Ron Nagocka and Graeme Davis? All three would soon form the group I.D.A. that would go on to create many new performance works.

064PLAYPAUSEFour pieces25:5631.10.79
Anecdote

same evening as Graeme Davis

065PLAYPAUSECassettes Are Driving Me Crazy46:4631.10.79
066Returning With More Synthesizer Goodies14.11.79
067PLAYPAUSEI. D. A.87:0021.11.79
Anecdote

First performance of group comprising Ron Nagorcka, Ernie Althoff and Graham Davis. Instrumentation varies but includes cassette players, spoken voice, modified saxophone, didgeridoo (played by Ron) and small instruments made out of found household and industrial objects.

068Texts28.11.79
069PLAYPAUSEThe Gang’s All Here28:3705.12.79
070PLAYPAUSEFortunes Ready Made70:0012.12.79
Anecdote

Group comprising David Chesworth, Mark Pollard, Jon Campbell, Rainer Linz, John Crawford. What is most notable today is hearing how unskilled as musicians we all sounded. It didn’t seem to matter and I think adds a certain endearing quality to the simple music we made, although others might not agree with that assessment.

Anecdote

Many artists, each doing their own thing

072PLAYPAUSEImprovising with Ernie 147:0816.01.80
Anecdote

Poster says: ‘Join in or just listen - it’s your choice. Bring an instrument - low budget, of course.’

073PLAYPAUSEImprovising with Ernie 240.2823.01.80
Anecdote

Improv featuring Ernie Althoff, Robert Goodge, David Chesworth and others.

074More of the same by Chris40:2827.01.80
075Maybe Graeme can throw more light on the subject30.01.80
076Previously Unfinished Bits and Pieces06.02.80
077“Their Way”13.02.80
Anecdote

Featuring Chis Knowles, David Wadleton, James Clayden. Probably the designer’s title.

078Question Mark20.02.80
Anecdote

written as ‘?’ on the poster

079PLAYPAUSEIf they annoy you, carry on talking67:0727.02.80
Anecdote

Separate performances from David and Chris on Serg synthesizers (Chris is probably playing Serg modular copies made by Julien Driscoll)

080PLAYPAUSELaughing Hands35:3312.03.80
081PLAYPAUSEPromotional concert for 3rd E.P.91:4119.03.80
082PLAYPAUSEFly by night (it’s cheaper)57:4426.03.80
083Two performances - untitled02.04.80
Anecdote

Two artists presenting separate programs. Bruno made performance works and Chris created music on serge modular synthesizers.

084Untitled09.04.80
085PLAYPAUSEI.D.A. give 2/3rds of what they’ve got128:2216.04.80
086Films & things like that23.04.80
087Video work for 2, 3, & 4 monitors30.04.80
Anecdote

including ‘Figures in a Landscape’

088The Threo + Bryce/Phillip/Melissa21.05.80
089PLAYPAUSEMinimalism, Serialism, Music Theatre. A mixed bag.44:0128.05.80
Anecdote

Starts with a group performance on classical instruments by Pollard, Parish, Sample and Gerrard and then is followed by a performance work by Rainer Linz (at 33.27) who, as part of his work, discusses the history of the piano while, with the help of others, the piano is noisily and chaotically moved around the small upstairs performance space.

090Ad Hoc04.06.80
091No cassettes whatsoever11.06.80
Anecdote

I.D.A. often used portable cassette players to record and play back material in their performances, so it was obviously notable that there were actually no cassettes used in this performance.

092Laughing Hands performance18.06.80
093Alone and together. 5 improvisations for familiar and non-familiar instruments25.06.80
Anecdote

Group comprising Ros Bandt, Julie Doyle, Gavin McCarthy, Carolyn Robb

094PLAYPAUSEPaul Schütze with Chris Wyatt45:5202.07.80
Anecdote

I would like to find out more about this performance. It appears that both played together, which was an unusual pairing, but very interesting. Paul is an improvising percussionist who percussively explores a wide variety of instruments and objects, while Chris played live modular synthesisers based on the architecture of the Serge synthesizer.

096PLAYPAUSEDoes Quite a Few Things - Themes & Variations41:1616.07.80
Anecdote

The performance work is titled Themes and Variations and is a rigorous minimalist solo performance based around early plainsong and the solfege system with its seven basic syllables - do, re, mi, fa, sol, la, ti.

097Students from Melbourne State College13.08.80
Anecdote

Melbourne State College trained teachers and is now part Melbourne University. It had some progressive aspects to it in the 70s. Ron Nagorcka taught music there and there was an influential film studies course run by Arthur Cantrill with teachers that included a very young Adrian Martin (film critic and performer at CHCMC). There are no records about what was presented at CHCMC on the night.

098PLAYPAUSENarrative Music + Formula Disco87:4720.08.80
099PLAYPAUSESeven Rare Dreamings58:3627.08.80
100John Crawford03.09.80
101So you thought you knew me!10.09.80
102The Lunatic Fringe17.09.80
103PLAYPAUSE41 aspects of the leisure setting46:5024.09.80
Anecdote

A performance of tape pieces by Paul Schütze from Laughing Hands.

104A short piece24.09.80
105PLAYPAUSEThe Dave & Phil Duo32:5001.10.80
Anecdote

Performing music that was released on their E.P. ‘Dave & Phil Present Themselves’ for the first 10 minutes, then a series of curious vocal pieces.

106Rainer Linz, John Campbell, Music 408.10.80
Anecdote

Rainer Linz performed with his group Splinter Faction in this concert

107New and Recent Films15.10.80
108Epic-Monumental-Project; (1) Moods for videotape and stereo sound03.11.80
Anecdote

Following his extensive trip to the USA Warren presented work in a series of Monday evening performances collectively called Epic-Monumental-Project (5 pieces for video, film, voice & electronics)

109PLAYPAUSEWell, why not?36:2405.11.80
110(2) Der Yiddisher Cowboy10.11.80
Anecdote

2] Der Yiddisher cowboy - a film in English in collaboration with Ronald Al Robboy

111performance12.11.80
112(3) If structure is an empty glass17.11.80
113Erotica vs Exotica19.11.80
Anecdote

Percussion work by Paul Schütze.
I’m guessing this is Philip Brophy’s title

114The Strange Effect19.11.80
115(4) Penguins; for film, slides, tape and reader24.11.80
116Herbie Jercher, Chris Babinskas26.11.80
Anecdote

Herbie was initially an accomplished jazz guitarist but has many more interesting strings to pull. His performance had a ‘performative’ aspect to them. I remember an air rifle being fired at a bird cage in one performance.
I think this was the only time Chris performed, as a movement artist.

117(5) 8-8s; 4 pairs in the shape of a piece for computer and electronics01.12.80
118Denise Holmes, Martin Lewis, Nick Stamopoulos + Chris Wyatt03.12.80
Anecdote

Denise Holmes, Martin Lewis, Nick Stamopoulos played music to three films by Robert Vincs. This is discussed in New Music #4 1980

120untitled08.12.80
Anecdote

Two well-known jazz performers who pushed boundaries in different ways. The Barry Veith Big Band was well known in jazz circles. CHCMC performer Herbie Jercher played guitar in the band.

121improvisations15.12.80
Anecdote

Two performances: K.G.B. then Chris, Robert and Ian

122Les Gilbert17.12.80
123Spontaneous consumption; Dream focus; colourless green dreams22.12.80
124Wartime Art24.12.80
Anecdote

A Christmas eve performance!

125Punkline and Contracted Cinema I & II21.01.81
Anecdote

The first season of 1981 was a season of mainly super-8 films made by CHCMC artists and other local makers.

Two separate presentations.
Poster says
Punkline (5 min. 1980 16mm. color. sound)

Contracted Cinema I & II (2 hrs. 1978 super 8. color. silent)
multiple projection

126Gravel pits and other works28.01.81
Anecdote

Two presentations:
Ian Sinclair - Gravel pits; Semi-autobiographical portrait; In his own image.
Warren Burt, Eva Karczag - Intercut; Slow moving in the big city; Computer Dance Video; Requiem; Tide pool Piece.

127Feyers; Zoomfilm & Some films with no titles04.02.81
Anecdote

1981 brought about an increased exploration of film for many artists who also worked in music, painting and drawing.

129Hoddle St suite; Cityscape series18.02.81
Anecdote

Films

130Skin of your eye25.02.81
Anecdote

Film

Anecdote

This recording is of I.D.A.’s contribution to the night.
Occasional benefit concerts were held to raise money for such things as the New Music publication. Other performers on the night were K.G.B., Tsk Tsk Tsk, Laughing Hands, Essendon Airport.

132A non-space & Suddenly I moved18.03.81
133Films …
134Music Video01.04.81
135PLAYPAUSESevered Heads, Ralph Traviato48:1308.04.81
Anecdote

Tom Ellard from Severed Heads (Sydney) sent me a tape of cut-ups to be played on the evening. NB: Ralph Traviati presented too. Les Gilbert also performed on this night.

136PLAYPAUSELes Gilbert performance11:0608.04.81
Anecdote

Les is playing soprano sax here although I’m pretty sure he was not a trained player. This performance occurred the same night at Severed Heads and Ralph Traviati

137Music15.04.81
Anecdote

Signals included Chris Knowles, David Wadelton (from Ad Hoc) and Dave Brown

139The Rock Criticism Show29.04.81
Anecdote

Two performances: The Connotations & Peter and Roxanne

140Landscapes of China & Film: Play Loud06.05.81
Anecdote

Two seperate presentations. Laughing Hands (improvising group); Daniel Scharf (film)

141PLAYPAUSEHigh Altitude Grabs56:0603.06.81
Anecdote

Performance was recorded by L.I.M.E. principle performer Ros Bandt on her own Sony cassette and mic system

142PLAYPAUSEChis Mann94:1310.06.81
Anecdote

Epic spoken word performance by Chris Mann. Chris reads from prepared poetic texts and also improvises. There are also interjections and responses from the audience.

143Videos & Performance17.06.81
Anecdote

Two separate presentations.

144Ros Bandt & Les Gilbert24.06.81
Anecdote

Seperate performances

145Films by Paul Fletcher and Viv Caroll01.07.81
146PLAYPAUSEHaving Fun with Burt and Ernie08.07.81
Anecdote

Title is a play on a famous puppet duo from American children’s TV show Sesame Street.

147The Connotations & Lisa Dethridge15.07.81
Anecdote

Two seperate performances

148Ian Cox & David Chesworth22.07.81
Anecdote

It is uncertain what was performed in this concert. Content may have been based around an installation artwork exhibited at the Ewing and George Paton Gallery around this time. The Ewing installation incorporated texts and sound/music based around pop song titles. More info if it comes to hand!

149John Dunkley Smith12.08.81
150International Music & Technology Conference26.08.81
Anecdote

For just one evening CHCMC became a venue for the International Music & Technology Conference, which was considered by some as something of a coup. Participants listed on the night include Graham Hair, David Dunn, Herb Jercher, Diane Thome, Peter Tahourdin. See the details listed on the poster

151George Huxley, Paul Schutze02.09.81
Anecdote

Three seperate performances occurred on the night. Slave Guitars presented by Peter Tyndall is listed separately

152PLAYPAUSESlave Guitars45:1202.09.81
Anecdote

The recording is of Peter Tyndall’s cassette release of Slave Guitars performances. The cassette contains two pieces or versions of the Slave Guitars. The performance on side two begins a 21:50 and is a live version with applause at the end. Probably not from the CHCMC concert, but possibly similar.

153Science is in the galleries, so why isn’t art in the laboratories?07.09.81
Anecdote

The Lunatic Fringe were one of the Little Bands - The Little Bands was a parallel music scene that existed in Fitzroy and then St Kilda at the same time as CHCMC.
Kate Buck was one of the members of Lunatic Fringe. Peter Tyndall (Slave Guitars) was also a member of many Little Band groups.

Click this link for a discussion of the Little Bands by its one time convener, the late Alan Bamford.

There might be a recording of this evening out there somewhere.

154Palimpsest09.09.81
Anecdote

The duo of David Chesworth and Robert Goodge had expanded to include Ian Cox on sax and Paul Fletcher on drums. Although the performance was untitled this music was later released on the album Palimpsest.

155Untitled14.09.81
Anecdote

I am assuming two seperate performances. Adrian and Ruth together and then Adrian with his group The Connotations

157Untitled21.09.81
Anecdote

Also listed on the poster is the single name Debra. I’m not sure who she was or if she presented.

160Noises vs muzaks + vice versa30.09.81
Anecdote

“Plus new and recent films”

Anecdote

Film screenings

162untitled07.10.81
Anecdote

Suignals is a variation of the group Ad Hoc minus James Clayden. Signals included David Wadleton, Chris Knowles and Dave Brown who performed on prepared guitar and other things. The performance possibly also included Philip Thomson on percussion.

Anecdote

An evening of artist films

Anecdote

Title refers to the IDA performance. Miles’ performance was untitled

165Makin’ Whoopee18.11.81
Anecdote

currently there is no information about this performance

166Experiments25.11.81
167Films: incl Floterian; Pan Separations; Wilpana; Time/colour separations02.12.81
168This year’s synthesizer music07.12.81
Anecdote

Not yet known what works were presented at this concert

169Logic of Fiction 109.12.81
Anecdote

This was Adrian Martin’s first contribution at CHCMC.

170Industry & Leisure09.12.81
Anecdote

This was a performance work involving David sorting, writing and performing lists of texts as well as some limited physical activities. The performance incorporatred super 8 film and a slides. The work was subsequently selected for the POPISM exhibition curated by Paul Taylor at the National Gallery of Victoria.

171Tape piece by Ernie & Mike Chapman09.12.81
172PLAYPAUSENew Line-up21:0014.12.81
173Videos & Films16.12.81
Anecdote

Videos: Hello Australia; ADS
Films: Suspense/play; The celluloid self

174PLAYPAUSEParty Music45:2223.12.81
Anecdote

This is possibly the only available recording of the Connotations performing. The opening song is poignant reflection on a coming 1982 where he calls on members of the audience to consider a future that is well passed.

(close)
(close) Memoir of a scene“Clifton Hill” (1980–1984)Adrian Martin

1 …

I always referred to it in writing as “CHCMC” (a bit of a mouthful, that acronym) or in speaking simply as “Clifton Hill”, as if it were the entire suburb involved! Some others called it the “Clifton Hill Music Centre”. (40 years later, a person in their 20s referred to it casually as the “Clifton Hill Machine Factory”!) But notice that what went missing mostly, was the “Community” bit, which evokes music classes and multicultural folk concerts and the like. And there was (as I now see, reading Ernie Althoff’s 1989 online memoir of the place) some of that, apparently, at the very start in the later 1970s, but such community groups soon “drifted away”, and the scene (as it was so often called, and as I still like to call it) formed its character more around what was then known (vaguely, to my eyes) as “New Music”, or the various kinds of experimental music, from classical-experimental (including the then-latest developments in computers, synthesis, etc.) to pop-experimental (New Wave, post-punk).

It is always fascinating to look into the holes or clouds in one’s own memory. I still have very good (if not exactly total) recall in my early 60s, but I realise now that there is a certain fog around some Clifton Hill details from 40 years ago. Intriguingly, this mist mainly relates to the physicality of the place itself. I cannot call up in my mind the various routes I took to get there by public transport (while living in Fitzroy in 1982, I must have walked there often) — i.e., when I wasn’t being driven there by friends — and I would find it hard to draw a precise map of the place itself in all its physical details. It was a jolt even to see, in my old notes, the actual address of it written down, something expunged from my head long ago: 6-10 Page Street.

What I mean to say is, the place to me is (was) a kind of dream, and hence its materiality is fuzzy. It is almost a kind of magical, fantasy house for me — sitting in the middle of that leafy, sleepy, residential street, as it still was in 2010 to 2012 when I lived in Clifton Hill — like one of the “secret places” in Jacques Rivette’s films, where you must go more and more inside it to find the hidden core … The intensity of certain experiences I underwent there, its significance in my young life, is so great that some of the mundane banality of it is blotted out. I lived it so strongly and immanently, I have no memory of some of it! It’s a pleasant kind of haze for me, even though I rationally know that, week by week, it wasn’t always so lovely or entrancing or entertaining. But my overall impression is a very positive one.

Ernie’s memoir brought back a few of the layout details. A ground floor, which I almost never saw in use, except when John Dunkley-Smith did a spectacular set of “simultaneous projections” on loops, across screens and walls. That was mighty impressive! I wrote about it 20 years later, in a retrospective catalogue essay for John. And then there was upstairs – but I don’t remember the stairs themselves I walked many times to get up there with everybody else.

I do remember the small set of steps leading to the (totally empty & tiny) bio box upstairs — they were easy to fall off. And I do remember vividly the stage and audience seating space, I especially remember it from the POV of performing on it, rather than from a spectator’s POV (although I was far more often spectator there than performer).

I always loved (perhaps naively) the basic acoustics of the place, and I especially loved the binaural audio recordings made by Ernie each week — that techno-dummy-head sitting in front of the stage —with Ernie working his tapes in the front row. I ended up hearing a lot of the back catalogue of Tsk Tsk Tsk tapes made that way, and I have an especially keen sense-memory of listening, on a long interstate train ride, to Ernie’s recording of an early Essendon Airport gig which had David Chesworth on a flattened-accordion type of cheap organ (amplified, as I remember, by clamping headphones to the top and bottom of the thing, and using that as a mic; there was no output jack!), Paul Fletcher on brush-stick drums, Robert Goodge doing simple wah-wah chords, and Ian Cox on plaintive sax or clarinet. It was great! I can relive this sensation right now, totally vividly.

As I’m sure everyone involved will recall, nobody had to pay to get into Clifton Hill events — perhaps there was donation-box or cap or something? Although we all swiftly got the label of being “elitist” — that always signals something interesting, some critical mass is actually happening; there was absolutely no blockade against anyone getting a spot on the program, every proposal was duly accepted; there was no committee decision, no editorialising of any kind. Anyone could play, or present anything.

But there was a certain price to pay for this precious freedom, or at least a firm, material responsibility that every participant had to take upon themselves. What I mean is: the upstairs space had no hardware whatsoever. Maybe I am now imagining this as a kind of primal Clifton Hill myth, but I seem to recall that somebody — not a regular performer — showed up one night and, totally befuddled, demanded to know: “Where’s the sound system?” There was none! People had to scrape together their own amplification (and rough ‘live’ mix or balance of elements), there was a lot of borrowing of other people’s amps — I know that’s how I had to work, I never had much of that stuff.

So this was really the most amateur, lo-fi, low-budget, everybody-in-and-giving-a-hand moment of the New Music scene as manifested at Clifton Hill. Later — from my point of view, at least — things professionalised more as people played in pubs and clubs, and a genuine mixer-person, familiar with what you did, was needed at the desk. My efforts with The Connotations (essentially me, Gerard Hayes & Kim Beissel) suffered at this level: I remember a horrendous night at the Crystal Ballroom where we were at the mad mercy of a mixer (Chris Wyatt) who had kindly offered to man the desk for us, and then proceeded to bombard us with every kind of reverb-delay tape-loop thingy he could whip up for his own amusement on the spot. We couldn’t even hear or keep to our own beat!

The ad hoc, lack of technology situation at Clifton Hill led to occasional catastrophes, and these I remember well: a slide projector whose carousel plummeted to the floor the moment I started it up for a performance; a move across the stage that ripped all the wires out of a speaker (filched from my domestic stereo system!); a cable that couldn’t be successfully removed from Robert’s guitar amp in the middle of an instrumental keyboard piece I was doing with Gerard. These disasters came with the territory! But, in my memory, we all muddled through, one way or another; the audience would wait for you to re-equilibriate!

Performance pieces were often a kind of patchwork of diverse elements and inputs: Chesworth and Ruth Williams did a little jig-dance as Gerard and I played and sang a solemn arrangement of the nursery rhyme “In and Out the Window” at the end of one our more minimalist sets.

I’m shocked if there’s the myth formed in anybody’s head that Clifton Hill audiences never applauded, and were too cool for school! In fact, I found the audience really quite warm and receptive, especially given the generally challenging kind of work presented there. There were many regular audience members, both performers and simply spectators (see my list below). We all premiered or workshopped our new stuff there first, before venturing out (if the invitations existed) to rock clubs on the one hand, or art events on the other — where the audiences were far colder, and sometimes even pretty hostile.

That is to say — and this is a big part of my warm, fuzzy memory of the time — CHCMC was really a safe space where one could try out anything, in a first-draft form. That was precious. In fact a bunch of things I offered there, such as the slide-and-tape pieces (almost entirely lost when I left Sydney in 1987, although I have reconstructed some narration texts) were never performed anywhere else ever again.

I have powerful memories of shows/sets that really moved me, very emotional experiences — it wasn’t all cold conceptualism, no matter how we may have tried to keep its analytical presentation (more on this below) rational, intellectual and cool. Seeing Jane (later Jayne) Stevenson’s Super-8 films Italian Boys and Dreams Come True, or Maria Kozic’s Manless projected large (after I had worked on the latter in her and Philip Brophy’s loungeroom) were just incredible experiences. The earliest image-and-sound presentations by Paul Fletcher, his first works in animation, were amazing. Same for the unveiling of the various phases and stages of Essendon Airport’s new material, or “Wartime Art” by Tsk Tsk Tsk: again, I have such a visceral memory of Philip’s thundering drums, Maria and Leigh Parkhill adding synth percussion, and the imposing row of three saxes (Ernie, Kim and Ralph Traviato) blaring out “The Twelve Days of Christmas” — and that was, if I recall correctly, performed on a hot Xmas night! Magical stuff. The stuff that dreams are made of!

2 …

Let me backtrack and put a little chronology and other background info into this memoir.

I first showed up as a Clifton Hill spectator sometime in 1980, in the first half of that year. I was 20. I never held any administrative position at Clifton Hill. It was film rather than music that brought me there in the first place, my first piece of public writing directly about the place was a report for the Sydney tabloid Filmnews on the film season during the first months of 1981 published under the title “Little Films We Made” (not my original, sober “New Cinema at Clifton Hill”). I also have in my archive a previously unpublished discussion-piece about that same season, now available on this documentation website. Before that (end of 1980), I had reviewed “Wartime Art” for the Centre’s more in-house New Music publication. Through Rolando Caputo (a La Trobe postgrad at that time and co-discussant in the film season piece, whom I had met at RMIT/3RRR film discussion events), I was introduced to Philip & Maria at the State Film Centre during 1980. I attended CHCMC all through 1980, and (in a fit of inspiration!) started performing with The Connotations in early 1981 (that took a lot of rehearsal and preparation, trying out and losing various people until the basic band gelled).

1982 was my peak year for doing stuff there, and feeling that it was the epicentre of some scene of activity when it intersected in the public mind with Art & Text, the POPISM exhibition, all of that. So it was around 1980 and ‘81 that I got to know the members of Essendon Airport, and others. In 1983, there was a cessation of activity at CHCMC — it was closed for 6 months of building repairs. Things were petering out during 1983 when Andrew Preston took it over, and it was all wrapped up in early 1984. Maybe my final band Miracle Filter played at one of the last nights in ’84.

So, arriving in 1980 meant I had already missed a lot of the Centre’s prior history under Ron Nagorcka (who I hardly ever met or interacted with). Warren Burt was probably the most visible and vocal presence who hung on from that time, more on him and me below. Ernie (who I also knew from his work at the Cinema Papers office) was always very friendly and a kind-of bridge between everybody, no matter their artistic or intellectual differences. This is what made me surprised, years later, to read Ernie’s expressed intense antipathy for the “French theory” gang at Clifton Hill — of which I was surely one of the head honchos!

Arriving in 1980 also means that, in a very crucial way, it wasn’t even primarily a music venue for me. It was always, coming in at that precise point, a mix of music, performance art, film, video (I recall the video work of Randall & Bendinelli, Randelli for short. Where did those guys go?), music-plus-trippy-road-movie-projections (by Laughing Hands), and writing as well. Remember, I had already been establishing myself as a published writer (and more tentatively, a public speaker) since the start of 1979, and I remember Philip regarding me as someone who was handily “well versed in theory” coming out of film studies (I took that as a compliment!). Paul Taylor had already made the connection with me (again at the State Film Centre screenings in 1980) as a writer for his then just-launched Art & Text magazine venture, before he or I were regular audience members at Clifton Hill.1

People, today, often collapse a lot of stuff together: Clifton Hill, POPISM, Art & Text, the club scene, Virgin Press and then Tension magazine (the latter launched 1983), the Super-8 Group, Juan Dávila queer art videos, Little Bands, sound art, political community art, Cantrills Filmnotes, conceptual architects, Hugo Race’s band Plays With Marionettes, the annual Surrealist Festival, the Fashion Design Council (FDC) — but really it was (from my perspective) a lot of very diverse threads coming together at certain moments and then falling apart and then re-threading, and all of these things spaced out over a five to seven year interval during the ‘80s, with a lot of changing states and phases, alliances and break-ups, in-between. (I have a vivid memory, for instance I can still hear one of the songs in my head! of Philip & Maria doing a pop demo, a hyper-ironic ditty with them both on vocals, titled “Let’s Get Married” produced by “Ross the Boss” Wilson of Daddy Cool fame. One of those moments when “the mainstream called”, and then quickly hung up!)

I’ve mentioned the warmth I felt from a regular Clifton Hill audience. I am trying to see into the crowd now and remember who was there — no easy feat. But some faces and names are returning to me, the more I concentrate on it.

There were many who were not performers in any sense at all, but really gave a life and flavour to our scene as very faithful audience members, open to anything and usually appreciative. Linda Baron (she was truly the social glue of the whole scene for quite a long time) and Peter Lawrence (though he always looked at us with suspicious “rock-n-roll eyes”!), Rolando and Lino Caputo, Paul Fletcher’s sister Jo, Vivienne Archdall and Philip Morland, that very mysterious rock-journalist Robert Lewis in natty glasses who appeared at every event, the brother-sister team of Michael & Barbara Agar, the ever-loyal Stephen Goddard & Sue Goldman … Ashley Crawford and a few others from the Virgin Press/Tension gang (like Robin Barden and Terry Hogan) must have hung around sometimes, although my impression is that they wandered in a bit later, and mainly in the rock club or art world extensions of the scene … also Janine Burke (close friend of Paul Taylor). There was Teresa DeSalvo, who died tragically young; she was from the art school context of Jayne and Philip, and appeared in the Tsk Tsk Tsk multi-monitor video performance-installation A Non Space.2

There were artists (Philip Tyndall, John Barbour, John Nixon, Vivienne Shark LeWitt, Linda Marrinon — both of those last-named were and are major Australian artists to emerge then) and influential curators, especially Judy Annear, Denise Robinson, Jennifer Phipps, plus (a little further out in the circle) the style brigade from 3RRR of Julie Purvis and Merryn Gates … Paul Taylor, of course, always seemingly at the hot centre of everything going on — and even a representation occasionally from the Style Council itself, architect Michael Trudgeon (from the Laughing Hands/Crowd magazine set) or the famous Robert Pearce of the FDC who died far too young (in 1989), a victim of AIDS.

I remember feeling during the peak period (in my experience) of 1981 & ‘82 that some people came selectively — maybe too selectively — to support only their special friends, with no curiosity about anybody or anything else that was going on. That’s inevitable, even understandable, in any complexly splintered arts scene such as Melbourne’s.

My overwhelming sense is that all, or most, of these people were very tolerant of what we called the militant dilettantism of that period: the idea that we could all dabble in everything, music, film, graphic design, video, performance (we all tended to do those frozen-gestural-pose performances that I still see groups of cool young people doing today: where did we get this theatrical mode from, I wonder? Yvonne Rainer?), writing, theory, even fashion design (Jayne and others got into that for a while). Amateurism, for a time at least, did really rule the roost, and proudly/defiantly so, at Clifton Hill. I only very occasionally ever got a whiff of superior disapproval from more professional sensibilities.

I remember the bemusement from someone I deeply respect now as then, Ted (Edward) Colless, wandering into the Essendon Airport/Connotations set at the Sydney College of the Arts (where the Slugfuckers with philosopher Terence Blake, now a pal on Facebook, also played) in 1982 during the Biennale, and merely commenting on the “grinding repetition” of it all that was no doubt aiming to produce a higher, numbed consciousness in the listener! (Ted spent years, in his various articles on Super-8 cinema and other amateur transgressive arts, mocking the militant dilettante tag that I more or less coined, bless his soul!)3

I tend to look at the constitution of cultural scenes such as the Clifton Hill crowd through the grid of universities and their courses at any given time in any given city or state, when those facts are relevant (as they certainly are here). La Trobe, of course, had the major feed-in at the start of the Clifton Hill adventure; if New Music courses were being promulgated elsewhere, I never heard about them, or whoever was running them. That La Trobe feed-in continued all the way through: Kay Morton, for example, and her friend Bronwen Price. Even there at La Trobe, it was a film/music crossover in both experimental practice and theory, since Brophy Goodge and Chesworth were all doing Cinema Studies under influential imported theory gurus, Sam Rohdie and Lesley Stern (both of whom have since passed away).

There must have been Darren Tofts lurking as a Swinburne Humanities representative, because he had grown up as a teen with both Lino Caputo and Leigh Parkhill, and he wrote retrospectively about those years — but I didn’t get to meet or know him properly until late in the ‘80s.

I have a sense, which I more or less verified at the time, that the very snobbish Melbourne Uni/Farrago crowd kept their distance from Clifton Hill (Gerard Hayes was a true-blue working-class alumnus of that place, but his years there had been 1976-1979) – it was only later that Virginia Trioli, for example, waltzed into the general post-Clifton Hill scene around 1984 or 1985, in the company of the Popist-type painter Chris van der Craats (he has a website, “A Speck in Cyberspace”, and is still producing work). But I also remember a night of techno sci-fi electronic music and video clips from Lisa Dethridge and friends (Melbourne Uni types) at Clifton Hill. As I said, the doors were open to anyone, even those nominally hostile to us!

The Monash and RMIT circles mainly stayed away, although I do recall RMIT’s Catalyst student magazine editor, Mark Worth (1958–2004), taking some interest in the scene and getting me to write for him over a few months (I wasn’t even a student there!). I also remember that he gave me a big speech in his RMIT office about how we all come from the Velvet Underground, but some of us are rock’n’rollin’ Lou Reed-people (him) and others are cerebral John Cale-people (me and, by extension, all Clifton Hill eggheads!).

There was a big wave coming from Melbourne State College (later Melbourne College of Advanced Education, and still later just the Education wing of Melbourne University), where I was teaching (heavily, and for pitiful pay) from 1982 to 1985. I guess I had something to do with that migration/influx of the cool and beautiful young crowd of budding educationalists! So many people came — most of whom were my students for the short or long term — from the Melbourne State source (I used to relentlessly promote CHCMC events during my classes): Sonia Leber, Anne Carter, Tim Stammers, Melanie Brelis, Alan Vandermeide, Althea Bartholomew (now gone), Ruth Williams, Glenn Bennie (who knew he was destined for such cult stardom with Underground Lovers?), Michelle Wild, Di Emry (she hired Essendon Airport to play her outdoors-at-home 21st birthday party, and later appeared in a Randelli art video around 1985/1986) – and Vikki Riley (1962–2012), who also dragged along some slightly reluctant folk from the (generally antagonistic to us then) post-Little Bands scene, such as Gavin Murray (also gone).

I vividly remember, when some situations and ephemeral alliances were really coming apart in 1983, that Gavin, with whom I was hosting a rickety and short-lived radical live radio show on 3RRR called Shrapnel, went on air in an angry, drugged haze to denounce “all this POPISM/Tsk Tsk Tsk/Art & Text/Clifton Hill … SHIT!”

Other cultural influences and intersections, beyond (sometimes overlapping with) the university sphere. There was an Arthur & Corinne Cantrill connection, a bit tenuous at first (they were suspicious, initially, of the Super-8 Revolution), but they eventually got on board promoting a lot of stuff happening at Clifton Hill via their Cantrills Filmnotes magazine (including some long texts by me), and presenting film/performance stuff there too, if I remember correctly. Maybe some of the Kris Hemensley/Collected Works bookshop poetry crowd (including ex-footballer Ted Hopkins, mastermind of an Art & Text parody, later the author of The Stats Revolution) drifted in from time to time (Kris ran in his avant-garde magazine H/Ear a long radio transcript discussion in 1983 about the general scene and attendant issues of the time, and I was one of the talkers there).

Another drop-in from another planet was Tobsha Learner (sometimes in the company of the intense actor John F. Howard, part of the neighbouring experimental theatre/performance scene of the ‘80s), who went on to make a thousand times more money and fame from writing than I, alas, ever will! I have often told the story – which is absolutely true, by the way – of the night that I watched Tobsha making, at half-time, the rounds of everyone present; before each individual, she would strike a pose and defiantly, histrionically ask: “Have you heard of … [dramatic pause for effect] … Tobsha Learner?”. If that person replied “No”, she would grandly swing her body around and walk away. When she reached me and asked the Million Dollar Question, I answered: “Yes, I have”. Which gave her a chance, at last, to deliver her triumphant punchline: “I am Tobsha Learner!”

A very strange memory swims into view now that I cannot date, but I guess it might have been 1983. And it wasn’t located at Clifton Hill, but some other bare stage in some other hall. Bruce Milne, an amiable entrepreneur of the independent music scene, organised this totally bizarre “show” — maybe it was just one or two songs — where there was, no kidding, 50 or 80 people on stage, all playing at once. It was just fucking noise, nobody could hear anything! Some people sang, a phalanx of percussionists (including Gerard) pounded a primitive beat, and everybody else made noise on whatever instrument was to hand. It was insanity! Well, I recall this because it was literally the meeting/melding of all the tribes: Clifton Hill, Little Bands, dancing fashionistas, the queer-camp brigade, the Crowd scene, bloody everybody was there! A rare moment of cultural harmony, and total musical disharmony!!

Here’s a more personal angle on it all. In 1980, arriving at Clifton Hill, 20 years old, I was actually a rather shy and lonely guy, with not many friends beyond the suburb (Richmond) in which I’d grown up, and the Catholic Boys secondary schools I’d attended (that’s where I met Gerard). And I wasn’t the only person in that basic situation. So Clifton Hill represented a whole social explosion for me, a much-needed liberation at the time (however timidly, on certain levels, I lived it). I always looked forward to intermission time on each performance night, that was when I got to talk to the likes of David, Jayne, Maria, Ian, and so many others. Gerard really got into that circle too, and became close with Ralph for many years to come. It’s funny: today, every cultural venue or institution has to have its own café, bar, or at least be affiliated with a nearby restaurant; at the Centre, we had none of that. Only a water urn for tea or coffee, as I recall! But it was enough. There was no place nearby to eat or drink! I remember some of us would sometimes end up in (fairly) nearby Lygon St for pizza.

Maybe this added to our apparently puritanical image in some people’s eyes — I very well remember the slightly mocking reaction to us in Sydney of the progressively lifestyled music/art critic Jody Berland from Canada; and Canberra’s art honcho James Mollison in 1981, baptizing me & Philip “The New Puritans”! I didn’t even yet drink booze in those early ‘80s days – and definitely no drugs of any sort!

3 …

When I arrived at Clifton Hill during 1980, the whole debate about the role, function and contents of the Centre’s New Music publication was going on, and Philip was at the centre of that, as I recall. My piece on “Wartime Art” (mentioned above) was in what turned out to be the final issue, late 1980 – and I well remember that Paul Taylor’s review and interview with Kim & me about the very first Connotations performance (“Rock Journalism”) went unpublished when the following issue was scrapped (at the start of ‘81). That document, too, sits in my archive.

Anyhow, partly through a confluence of factors and partly through my own drive to identify and hence take sides, I ended up quickly becoming some kind of theoretical spokesman (on 3RRR arts programs like Wild Speculations that I co-hosted with Sue McCauley) for what got quickly caricatured as the second degree position (following Roland Barthes as appropriated by Paul Taylor — that reductive/seductive second-degree tag followed me around forever). I was part of the seminar” series at CHCMC in 1982; I was even invited to give a talk (on “The Fantasia of Structure”, my brave title) at La Trobe Music Department. I was also tapped by Paul Taylor to review David’s Layer on Layer album for an early Art & Text (a piece that became a key reference for Chris McAuliffe in his later research thesis about local art movements in this period).4

In that article, I did maybe my best shot at speaking about or describing the inner workings of a musical project: my intuition, again taken from film theory, was all about how the listener/auditeur becomes implicated in, displaced and disturbed by what they hear, the aural and semantic paths they follow through your songs/tracks.

So, although coming mainly from film study and film criticism, I became both a performing musician on a certain amateur but game level (we got better and more proficient as we went on), and also some kind of music-discourse guy, for places like Art-Network (which was incredibly sceptical about us, but at least gave us a bit of page-space) and elsewhere (weird little art, craft & architecture con-fabs going on everywhere then).

The actual musical performance period that I was directly involved in went from the start of 1981 to the start of 1984, so just 3 years in all; while the music discourse period was even shorter, two years at best, mainly 1981 and ‘82. In the initial polemical heat, Warren Burt and I tended to face off as opponents (and sometimes he had the formidably yet elegantly snarling Chris Mann [1949–2018] by his side); later I came to understand and respect Warren for the fearless and innovative explorer he really was, and I think he even came to like and respect me a bit, too, as a film critic mainly. But, back then …

I didn’t think of it this way in the early ‘80s, but now when I look back and assess this Clifton Hill period (and especially my own involvement in it) I see it in a particular and somewhat self-critical way. I can easily boil down the group position that united the flank of Essendon Airport and Tsk Tsk Tsk (always, and rightly, the starring acts), and their various fellow travellers such as The Connotations at the time. It was roughly a kind of cultural semiotics stance that drove on the mantra that “every piece of music, invented or quoted, comes with a history of associations” — and the task of performance or recording was to expose, deconstruct, work over and play with those sedimented associations. (That’s the substance of my “Wartime Art” review, for instance.)

Inherent in that whole approach, but always a secondary matter for me, was the supposed collapsing of high and low cultural references (later taken as the defining mark of some specious artworld postmodernism), — but that was really a very natural reflex on our parts; we were all part of a TV generation, and a lot of song titles, essay headings, catchphrases and so on were taken straight from dopey TV ads, popular programs and formats, and so on. (I have a delicious memory of Taylor cheekily trying to convince artist Jenny Watson that her piece “Different Strokes” for Art & Text should be renamed “Diff’rent Strokes”, simply because it was the name of a then-current American comedy TV series.) That kind of borrowing was no big deal for us, however much it may have horrified certain genteel souls in the arts-opinion pages of the daily newspapers.

Our general approach was quite akin to the line in cinema theory at the time that experimental cinema had to destabilise the codes of Hollywood narrative genres like film noir, melodrama, love story – from the inside, as it were. And this movement was going on all over the world: in the New York No Wave films and music, in Scritti Politti, Material, ABC (“Look of Love”), “mutant disco”, and dozens of other exemplars. So, we were all riding that wave, triumphantly – it was (as we all said at the time) a kind of neo-Warholian consciousness, something really happening and pervading pop culture with irony, resistance, playfulness …

Here comes the self-criticism part. It is not at all true for David or Philip or Kim (or, on the other side, Warren), who have always been deeply, intrinsically musical people; but it does hold true for me and some others who were around the scene in the ‘80s. What I’m talking about is this: I elaborated a philosophically-politically instrumental approach to music, in the sense of making it an opportunistic instrument to illuminate something else: cultural codes, social meanings. I was always saying this, in speech and in print, such as in each evening’s program notes that Dunkley-Smith (as he passed through) criticised for the way that they (in his view) overloaded, overdetermined, decoded and explained everything (whereas he thought the materiality of the work itself should do that task): making music can be good if we use it to illuminate something else, something bigger than itself. This was also my chosen weapon of rhetoric in relation to art (painting, etc.) and the art world, too, where I also moonlighted (and still do, occasionally) as a commentator: art can focus something bigger than mere art.

The problem with this position, as I now see and evaluate it, is that it involved me in a hypocrisy that smells a little of bad faith: I never would have taken the position that cinema (the medium or art form that means the most to me) is important to talk about only if we aim higher or broader than the details of films themselves, in all their complexity, and go (somehow) beyond cinema to make a general cultural or political point. When it comes to cinema, I’m not instrumental in that way; rather, I become the instrument of the medium, its servant! Which is how it should basically be, I fervently believe.

I’m not saying we all have to be text-only-fixated formalists. Wider contexts are also important to shine a light on — and I note that a newer wave of practitioners (around, for instance Joel Stern and the Liquid Architecture scene) have returned to this contextual framework in their own way. But it all has to be grounded, at some key point, in the materiality of work and medium.

This is why I didn’t continue on with music criticism or commentary myself, except in very special or isolated cases; I wasn’t really inside that medium the way I should have been, the way one needs to be as a true critic. The theoretical or categorical distinction I posed in my big 1982 Art-Network piece (partly made from interviews/questionnaires with several players of the Clifton Hill scene), “Texts and Gestures”, still holds good for me today: you can regard any piece as a work-in-itself (a text), and/or as a gesture in a wider field. (The philosopher Giorgio Agamben has, since that time, brought a welcome depth and usefulness to this distinction.) When it came to my involvement in music between 1980 and ‘84, I was much more weighted toward gesture than text. Today, I would likely try to rebalance that, if I could.

And, as for actually playing music in public, although I harboured various fancy dreams and plans, everything had shifted under my feet by 1984: where people like David, Robert and Philip were really getting their act together and exploring various musical paths and projects in public (even Jayne and Ralph had their Flaming Stars band, briefly – and I remember their songs although I heard them only once, “New Pair of Pants” and “River of Dreams”), I literally had no money (and no way of getting it), no equipment, no gang of musicians around me (once I had exhausted the student pool at Melbourne State), no connections, no way of getting it out there into clubs or onto festival/art stages, post Clifton Hill.

Even after recording our Connotations EP record with David at the controls (the master tape famously lost! ) for the bottom-dollar price of the $1,000 we had earned through gigging, we then didn’t have enough dough to actually get it pressed and distributed, because that whole subterranean cheapie opportunity collapsed for our socio-economic underground sector …

So, when the Centre died, my own centre for musical operations was gone, vanished. It was, finally, as simple as that. I think something similar happened for Ralph, Jayne, Maria (although she later worked music into her “Bitch” project of the ‘90s) and many others. People such as Gerard who had mainly been there for the ride, got off the ride. The audience of hangers-on drifted across to other scenes, if they could find them. And others like Kim have intermittently tried to pursue their desire in the music area, through diverse means and channels (such as his curation of rare tracks for special re-release), as well as live performance.

In 1985, I really pledged myself, internally, to a renewed energy invested in film analysis, film teaching, and especially writing about film – you gotta recognise and seize what you’re best at, and not be a dilettante (on too many levels) forever! Today I’m still on that filmic path — and I came back to creative practice through another route, the short audiovisual essays I began making with my partner Cristina Álvarez López in 2012 (we’ve done hundreds by now). I have even started composing & recording lo fi, digitally-enabled music for some of those!

So, militant dilettantism lives on, after all.


© Adrian Martin, 24–26 July, 2019 (reworked September 2023 & June 2024)


  1. I have written two long essays, 14 years apart, looking back on the “Paul Taylor years” in Australia; both are collected in the book edited by Helen Hughes & Nicholas Croggon, ‘Impresario: Paul Taylor – The Melbourne Years 1980–1984’ (Melbourne: Surpllus, 2013). 

  2. This work is documented in Cantrills Filmnotes (no. 35/36, April 1981) and the book Made by → ↑ → (1983). 

  3. See the pieces from this period gathered in Edward Colless, The Error of My Ways (Brisbane: Institute of Modern Art, 1995). 

  4. See my “Record Review: Layer on Layer by David Chesworth”, Art & Text, no. 3 (Spring 1981), pp. 87-90.